There is a lot of chatter about 5G on the Internet and some is true while other is quite suspect. There is even a story correlating the highest homicide rate in Charlotte, North Carolina with the 5G rollout. I read the National Institute of Health studies on 5G and there were no red flags, but there should be more studies. If you are truly worried though there are countermeasures you can take with EMF clothing protection. There are even protection solutions for your cell phone. See clothing protection here.

I looked at some solutions on the market five years ago and they have come along way. There are better looking EMF protection baseball caps which is a  far cry from the earlier “brain-caps.” The EMF clothing looks more fashionable as well. There are some drawbacks with the technology because it does not last forever and washing it removes the protection coating. It is still better than having nothing and some people literally sleep better wearing the brain cap.

This letter, written by a biochemistry professor and internationally known scientist on the subject of EMF health effects, Dr. Martin Pall, discusses the dangers of 5G; some key excerpts are listed below:

“EMFs act by activating channels in the membrane that surrounds each of our cells, called voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs). The EMFs put forces on the voltage sensor that controls the VGCCs of about 7.2 million times greater than the forces on other charged groups in our cells. This is why weak EMFs have such large biological effects on the cells of our bodies.

Pulsed EMFs are, in most cases, more biologically active and therefore more dangerous than are non-pulsed (continuous wave) EMFs. All cordless communication devices communicate via pulsations, because it is the pulsations that carry the information communicated.

5G will be much more active in activating the VGCCs and producing health impacts because of its rapid absorption by materials in the body, because of its very rapid pulsations and because of the huge number antennae they are planning to put up, at least 200 times the number of antennae from all current cell phone towers. What this means is that the impacts on the outer one to two inches of our bodies will be massive.”

I will say this information needs to be peer reviewed before taken as factual. The NIH studies did not reflect this scenario, but obviously there is a lot of distrust of the 5G technology and the increase in radiation it brings to the environment. The NIH Experiment used a built-in incubator of the 60 GHz exposure system (a) and an inside view of the incubator (b). The chamber of the exposure system was maintained under controlled conditions similar to those in an incubator, i.e., an atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at a relative humidity of >95% and a temperature of 37 °C. This configuration would put the human cellular structure closer to the 60 Ghz frequency radiation and not be obscured by trees and buildings in an uncontrolled setting.

The conclusion of this controlled study of the effect of 60 Ghz frequency on human DNA was no significant effect on MN frequency, single-strand breaks in the DNA, or Hsp expression. In conclusion, the exposure of cells to millimeter-wavelength radiation at 60 GHz does not seem to have adverse effects on the genotoxicity or Hsp expression of cultured HCE-T and SRA01/04 cells using our specific experimental conditions, although the possible effects of other frequencies require further study.